FOREX NEWS

As US markets emerge from their lengthened Independence Day weekend, traders around the world will have another chance to digest last Thursday’s disappointing non-farm payrolls report. The June figure fell far short of expectations of 110k new jobs, coming in at just 57k instead, while April and May saw downward revisions to the sum of 74k fewer jobs than initially estimated. The apparent cooldown in the US labour market was enough to shift interest rate expectations last week, the overall consensus being that a rate hike is now likely to be pushed further down the line. High inflation numbers in the first half of the year have pressured the Fed into hiking rates on the dollar to control runaway price appreciation, but the latest jobs figures will likely stay the central bank’s hand for the time being. The dollar fell sharply last Thursday following the release of the jobs report, losing around half a percent against other major currencies, although the DXY remains comparatively high around 101 this morning. The one positive element of the report is a minor drop in the unemployment rate, which fell from 4.3% to 4.2%, while the broader U-6 rate also nudged lower to 7.9% from 8.1% the month prior. Last week also saw the publication of the June ISM manufacturing PMI, which at 53.3 continued to show a sector firmly in expansion. The services sector will follow suit later today, with estimates pointing north of 54. Veering away from an immediate interest rate hike favours non-yield-bearing assets such as gold and silver, which indeed made a sharp U-turn last Thursday. After settling down to $4,000 per ounce the week before, gold buyers stepped in to push the precious metal to highs of $4,200 by the Friday close, while silver was able to regain $60 following the jobs report and push higher still the next day, reaching $62.4 as the week drew to an end. Even Bitcoin showed signs of strength, lifting prices from lows of 57,500 to highs of 63,500 over the weekend. Although the imagined 4th of July deadline for the Clarity Act has come and gone, the likelihood of the bill being enshrined into US law has increased over the last few days, with Polymarket showing odds of over 50% for a successful passage through Congress. Senators are now working on the final public draft of the new text, which is expected to be published for public review in the coming days. An interesting development is being monitored in US stock markets, whereby capital appears to be rotating out of tech and into other sectors. Last Thursday’s NFP report prompted a very different response in the Dow Jones index compared to the tech-heavy Nasdaq, with the former rising 1.1% to a new all-time high of 52,900 points, while the latter shed 0.8%, remaining 5% below its own record high established back in early June. Zooming out, the effect was even more pronounced on a monthly basis, with the Dow rising 2.5% in June, and the Nasdaq Composite falling 1.5% over the same time frame. Technology valuations are being reassessed with a greater degree of scrutiny, particularly with regard to AI spending and revenue. The prospect of more stable rates on the dollar also benefits the wider stock market instead of a narrow band of hype stocks. Next week’s earnings calendar will force the semiconductor space to defend its position, with a number of heavy-hitting companies stepping up to the stage. The economic calendar cools down this week, having very little to offer compared to last week’s NFP report. As mentioned above, the ISM services PMI is expected to show continued momentum in the US services sector later today, but the rest of the week is more or less a blank slate. The one exception arrives on Wednesday in the form of the latest FOMC minutes, which will provide detailed insights into Kevin Warsh’s first meeting at the helm of the Fed. Analysts will be keen to find out how much inflation pressure the board attributes to the recent surge in oil prices versus other economic factors. With crude oil back down to pre-crisis levels, the Fed may be more willing to shrug off the recent uptick in inflation. #NFP #FOMC #SPX About the Author Lawrence J. came from a strong technical and engineering background before pivoting into a more financial role later on in his career. Always interested in international finance, Lawrence is experienced in both traditional markets as well as the emerging crypto markets. He now serves as the financial writer for RADEX MARKETS. Reviewed by RADEX MARKETS Risk Warning: Trading derivatives and leveraged products carries a high level of risk, including the risk of losing substantially more than your initial investment.

Every trader has experienced it at some point. You enter a trade perfectly, watch it move nicely into profit, start imagining what you'll spend the gains on, and then... the market turns around and gives it all back. The truth is that a great entry can be completely ruined by a poor exit. Fear makes traders close winners too early, while greed convinces them to hold on for "just a little bit more" until the profit disappears. A take-profit order solves this problem by automatically closing a trade when a predetermined profit target is reached. In this guide, we'll explain what a take-profit order is, how it works, how to set one correctly, and the advantages and disadvantages every trader should understand before using it. A take-profit (TP) order automatically closes an open trading position when the market reaches a predefined profit level. It allows traders to lock in gains without needing to constantly monitor the market and is commonly used alongside a stop-loss order to define both risk and reward before entering a trade. Ready to put your trading knowledge into practice? and start building a disciplined trading plan today. A take-profit order (TP) is a limit order that automatically closes an open position when the market reaches a predefined profit target. It converts an unrealised gain, often called a "paper profit", into a realised profit that is added to your account balance. Take-profit orders are commonly abbreviated as T/P on trading platforms. They are essentially the profit-taking counterpart to a stop-loss order. While a stop-loss protects you from excessive losses, a take-profit helps secure gains when your target is achieved. Many traders use take-profit orders because they remove guesswork and emotion from the exit process. Rather than deciding in the heat of the moment whether to close a trade, the decision is made before the trade is even opened. This disciplined approach helps traders stay consistent and avoid emotional mistakes that can negatively impact long-term performance. Read more:Types of forex orders: A complete beginner’s guide A take-profit order works in a very straightforward way. You choose a price level where you would like to exit the trade with a profit. If the market reaches that level, the platform automatically closes your position. For example, if EUR/USD is trading at 1.1500 and you believe it will rise, you may buy the pair and place a take-profit order at 1.1600. If the market reaches 1.1600, your position closes automatically and the profit is secured. If the market never reaches your target, the take-profit order remains inactive. The trade stays open until either the target is reached, a stop-loss is triggered, or you manually close the position. In most trading strategies, a take-profit order is paired with a stop-loss order. Together, they create a complete trading plan: One important point to remember is that once a take-profit order is triggered, the trade is closed regardless of what happens next. Sometimes the market continues moving strongly in your favour after your target is hit. This is the trade-off for securing profits in a disciplined and consistent way. Read more:What is a stop-loss order and how to set it Once you know where a take-profit order belongs, setting one becomes a simple three-step routine. The key is to decide your exit before the trade begins rather than trying to make decisions while the market is moving. Many new traders spend hours looking for the perfect entry but only seconds thinking about their exit. In reality, successful trading is often more about managing exits than finding entries. The first step is deciding where you want to take profit. This decision should be based on market analysis rather than a random number that simply sounds appealing. Common methods traders use include: Personally, I always prefer to identify the target level on the chart first and then build the trade around it. If the target doesn't provide a sensible risk-to-reward ratio, I simply move on to another opportunity. For example, if EUR/USD has repeatedly struggled to break above 1.1650, that area may become a logical take-profit target for a long position. Markets often react around historical price levels because that's where clusters of buy and sell orders tend to sit. This matters because good targets are based on what the market is doing, not what we hope it will do. The term risk-to-reward ratio refers to the amount you are willing to risk compared to the potential profit you expect to make. Many traders aim for a minimum risk-to-reward ratio of 1:2. In simple terms, they target £2 of profit for every £1 they risk. Here's a forex example: In this scenario: The beauty of this approach is that you don't need to win every trade to be profitable. Imagine winning only 50% of your trades: Net result = +250 pips. This is one reason professional traders often focus more on risk management than on having an exceptionally high win rate. Read more:What are pips in forex and how to calculate their value The final step is to set a stop-loss order alongside your take-profit order. Once you've identified your target, simply enter the take-profit price into your trading platform. Most platforms allow you to enter the target as: At the same time, you should define where the trade becomes invalid and place a stop-loss order accordingly. Doing this before entering the market creates a complete trading plan: Many beginner traders only think about how much money they can make. Experienced traders think about both sides of the equation before they click the buy or sell button. For this reason, a take-profit order is most effective when it works together with a well-placed stop-loss order. One of the biggest questions traders ask is where a take-profit order should actually be placed. After more than 15 years around the markets, I've learned that successful traders don't simply choose a nice round number and hope for the best. Instead, they look at the chart structure, the current volatility, and the type of trading setup they're taking. The market itself usually provides clues about where a move may reasonably end. Here are some of the most common methods traders use. Support and resistance levels are among the most popular areas for placing take-profit orders. If you're buying, a resistance level often becomes a natural target because that's where sellers have previously stepped into the market. If you're selling, a support level may act as your target for the opposite reason. Many traders place their take-profit slightly before the exact level rather than directly on it. This increases the chance of being filled before a potential market reversal occurs. A previous swing high or swing low can also provide a logical exit point. For a long trade, the most recent significant swing high often acts as a target because the market has already shown that it reacted there before. For a short trade, the previous swing low may serve the same purpose. These levels are easy to identify and are frequently watched by traders around the world, which often makes them self-fulfilling areas of interest. A measured move uses the size of an existing chart pattern to estimate how far the next move could travel. Examples include: If a trading range measures 100 pips in height, traders may project that same distance from the breakout point to estimate a potential target. While no pattern is guaranteed to reach its projected target, measured moves provide a structured and objective method of setting take-profit levels. Read more:15 Best Chart Patterns Every Trader Should Know Read more:How to Read Forex Charts for Traders Some traders start with the risk first and calculate the target from there. For example: This method ensures every trade maintains a favourable risk-to-reward profile. Even if only a portion of trades are successful, the maths can still work in the trader's favour over time. Some experienced traders also choose to take partial profits at one target while allowing the remainder of the position to continue running using a trailing stop. This approach can help capture larger trends while still securing some gains along the way. It's worth remembering that no take-profit level guarantees a fill under all market conditions. During periods of low liquidity, fast-moving news events, or sudden gaps, execution can differ from expectations. For this reason, take-profit orders should be viewed as part of a broader risk-management plan rather than a guarantee of results. Read more:What is forex volatility? Definition, causes, strategies Imagine a trader believes EUR/USD is about to move higher and opens a long position at 1.2980. After analysing the chart, they identify 1.3180 as a realistic target and place a take-profit order there, creating a potential gain of 200 pips. They also place a stop-loss below the entry price to establish a clear risk-to-reward ratio before entering the trade. If EUR/USD reaches 1.3180, the take-profit order automatically closes the position and locks in the gain. If the market never reaches that level, the order simply remains active while the trade stays open. For UK traders using a GBP-denominated account, any profit generated is automatically converted back into pounds sterling (£) at the prevailing exchange rate when the trade is settled. Read more:Long vs Short Position Compared: How to Trade Each Like a Pro A take-profit order is one of the most useful risk-management tools available to traders, but like every trading tool, it comes with both advantages and disadvantages. Understanding both sides helps you use it more effectively. One of the biggest benefits of a take-profit order is that it removes the need to constantly watch the market. Once the target is set, the platform does the work for you. This can be particularly useful for forex traders because the market operates 24 hours a day during the trading week. Few people want to wake up at 3 a.m. to check whether EUR/USD has finally reached their target. A take-profit order helps convert unrealised gains into realised profits. Instead of hoping the market continues moving in your favour, you secure the profit once your target is reached. Many traders have experienced the frustration of watching a winning trade turn into a losing one because they didn't take profit when they had the chance. Using a take-profit order encourages traders to think about potential reward before entering a position. By defining both the stop-loss and take-profit levels in advance, traders can calculate whether the opportunity is worth taking. This creates a more structured and professional approach to trading. Emotions are often a trader's worst enemy. Fear can cause premature exits, while greed can encourage traders to hold positions for too long. A take-profit order helps remove emotional decision-making by creating a clear exit plan before the trade begins. Read more:What Is Market Sentiment? Definition, Indicators and Strategies Not everyone can spend their entire day staring at charts. Many traders have jobs, businesses, or families that require attention. A take-profit order allows positions to be managed automatically, giving traders more flexibility without constantly monitoring price movements. Read more:10 Forex risk management tips every trader should know A take-profit order closes the trade once the target is reached, regardless of what happens afterwards. Sometimes the market continues moving strongly in your favour after the position has closed. While the profit has been secured, additional gains may have been left on the table. Markets often pause or retrace before continuing their trend. If a take-profit target is set too close, a trader may exit a position just before a much larger move develops. This is why target selection is almost as important as entry selection. Some traders become overly reliant on automatic orders and stop actively managing their trading process. While take-profit orders are useful, they should not replace proper market analysis, trade reviews, and ongoing risk management. Read more:What is copy trading? How beginners can get started During major economic announcements or periods of extreme volatility, prices can move very quickly. In some situations, the execution price may differ slightly from the intended target. While this is relatively uncommon in highly liquid forex pairs, it can occur during fast-moving market conditions. Read more:What is slippage and how to avoid it in trading Long-term trend traders sometimes prefer flexible exits rather than fixed profit targets. If the goal is to capture a major trend lasting weeks or months, a rigid take-profit order may close the trade before the larger move unfolds. Read more:Types of forex traders and how they trade A take-profit order and a stop-loss order are two sides of the same risk-management plan. One is designed to secure gains, while the other is designed to limit losses. Most successful traders use both orders together. A take-profit without a stop-loss defines the reward but leaves risk uncontrolled. A stop-loss without a take-profit defines the risk but leaves the exit plan incomplete. The most effective trading plans usually include both from the outset. Read more:What is a stop-loss order and how to set it Even experienced traders occasionally make mistakes when setting profit targets. Here are some of the most common issues I see and how to avoid them. New traders often choose targets like 1.1000, 1.2000, or 2.0000 simply because they look neat. The problem is that many traders are thinking the same thing. Price frequently reverses just before obvious psychological levels. I often prefer placing targets slightly ahead of these areas to improve the chances of being filled. One of the most dangerous habits is adjusting a take-profit order higher as price approaches it. What starts as confidence can quickly become greed. I've seen traders turn profitable trades into break-even results simply because they wanted "just a little bit more." A take-profit order should never be viewed as a replacement for a stop-loss. Without a stop-loss, there is no defined downside risk. Every trade should have both an exit for profit and an exit for protection. A common mistake is expecting a huge move from a market that typically doesn't travel that far within the chosen timeframe. If your target rarely gets hit, capital can become tied up in stagnant positions. The target should reflect both the market environment and the timeframe being traded. Every trade carries costs, including spreads and, in some cases, commissions or overnight financing charges. When targets are set too close to the entry point, these costs can significantly reduce the potential reward. Always consider the net profit rather than the headline profit figure. In trading and investing, to take profit means closing an open position to lock in financial gains after the market has moved in your favour. It converts an unrealised, or "paper", profit into actual realised profit. A common approach is to use a 1:2 risk-to-reward ratio, meaning you aim to make twice as much as you risk. For example, if your stop-loss is 50 pips away from your entry, your take-profit target may be set 100 pips away. Take profit is abbreviated as T/P. For example, a trader buys EUR/USD at 1.2980 and places a take-profit order at 1.3180. If the market reaches that level, the position closes automatically and the profit is secured. Take-profit orders can be particularly useful for short-term traders who want to manage risk and remove emotion from their exits. Longer-term traders may use them less frequently because fixed targets can sometimes limit larger gains. Yes. Most trading platforms allow you to modify a take-profit order at any time while the trade remains open. Any changes should ideally be based on market analysis rather than emotion. Not always. In highly volatile or fast-moving markets, slippage can occur and execution may differ slightly from the intended level. However, under normal market conditions, take-profit orders generally execute close to the specified price. Yes. Take-profit orders can help beginners build discipline by defining an exit strategy before entering a trade. They also reduce the temptation to make emotional decisions while a position is open. A take-profit order is one of the simplest and most effective tools traders can use to lock in gains and remove emotion from the trading process. Rather than relying on hope, fear, or guesswork, it allows you to define exactly where you want to exit before the trade begins. When combined with a stop-loss order and a sensible risk-to-reward ratio, a take-profit order becomes part of a complete risk-management framework. It helps traders stay disciplined, protect profits, and approach the markets with a structured plan. After all, trading like a professional isn't about predicting every market move correctly. It's about planning the exit before the entry, managing risk carefully, and consistently following the strategy you've already decided upon. That is where long-term trading success begins.

Most of us learn this one the hard way. You spot a clean break above resistance — a ceiling the price kept stalling at — buy it, and within a few minutes the trade is in the red. Price snaps back, takes out your stop, and then — almost to spite you — runs in the exact direction you first expected. That "stop hunt" is rarely bad luck. More often it is a liquidity sweep: a deliberate push beyond an obvious level to trigger the orders resting there before the market turns. In this guide you will learn what a liquidity sweep is, how it differs from a liquidity grab, how it actually works in the market, how to identify and trade one (with a worked EUR/USD example), the smart-money logic behind it, and how to manage the risk. Let's start with a plain definition. A liquidity sweep is when price deliberately pushes just beyond an obvious high or low to trigger the stop-loss and pending orders clustered there, and then often reverses. Traders read it as a footprint of large order flow and trade the reversal — with confirmation — rather than chasing the initial move. Want to put these ideas onto a live chart? Open an account and follow the price action in real market conditions. A liquidity sweep is a move in which price deliberately trades through a level where liquidity is concentrated. By liquidity we just mean the resting orders — the stop-losses and pending buys and sells waiting at a price. They pile up in obvious spots: a prior swing high or low (a clear peak or dip on the chart), the edge of a range (a zone price keeps bouncing inside), or a round number. Price runs the level, trips those orders, and then usually gets rejected and reverses. It helps to know which orders are being run. Buy-side liquidity rests above obvious highs (the stop-losses of short-sellers plus breakout buy orders), while sell-side liquidity rests below obvious lows (the stop-losses of long traders plus breakout sell orders). A sweep of sell-side liquidity, below a low, tends to set a bullish bias — a lean toward buying; a sweep of buy-side liquidity, above a high, leans bearish. If you want the full picture of how liquidity pools form and why they matter, our dedicated guide goes deeper. Read more: What is liquidity in Forex and how is it measured? Why does this happen at all? There's nothing conspiratorial about it. Big players need other people's orders on the other side to fill a large position without heavy slippage — the gap between the price you expect and the price you actually get — so price naturally gravitates to where that liquidity sits. The clustered stops above a high or below a low are simply the easiest place to find it. Read more: What is slippage and how to avoid it in trading? So what usually happens after a liquidity sweep? Immediately after a genuine one, the market often reverses sharply in the opposite direction, frequently with a shift in market structure — the chart's run of highs and lows starting to point the other way. But I want to be clear: that is a signal to act on only with confirmation, not a guarantee. A sweep on its own is not an entry. It points you toward one side and marks a zone to watch — the real work begins there. Although "liquidity sweep" and "liquidity grab" are often used interchangeably, they describe slightly different market behaviours with different purposes. Both trigger pending orders through a price move, but they differ in scale, intent, and the way they leave their mark on the chart. Knowing the difference helps you read what the move is really telling you. Read more: Liquidity Grab Guide: Definition, Signals & Trading Techniques A sweep tends to be the broader of the two. It can play out over one to several candles and may even consolidate just beyond the level before snapping back. It runs a wider pool of liquidity — the kind of move associated with large players building or exiting size — so the excursion can be larger and the reversal that follows clearer, often accompanied by a shift in structure. Sweeps show up on every timeframe, but they read more cleanly on the higher ones. Simple example: EUR/USD has buy-side liquidity above the prior high at 1.1830. Price breaks above, hovers between 1.1830 and 1.1845 for a few candles, then closes back below 1.1830. That is a sweep — and it tilts the bias bearish. A grab is faster and tighter. It usually completes inside a single candle, leaving a long wick with a small body — close in shape to a dragonfly or gravestone doji. It trips the cluster of stops at one obvious level, then snaps straight back; the reaction is sharp and immediate. Grabs are most often spotted on lower timeframes, where that quick poke-and-reject is easy to see. Simple example: GBP/USD dips below the prior low at 1.2600 for just seconds, spiking down to 1.2592 to trip stops before snapping back above 1.2600, leaving a long lower wick. That is a grab — and it tilts the bias bullish. A candle's body is the block between its open and close; the wick (or shadow) is the thin line poking out, marking the high and low it reached. A doji is a candle with a tiny body and long wick(s) — price pushed one way but closed back near where it started, which is a classic sign of rejection. The candlestick patterns left behind by these rejections are worth studying in their own right, because they often mark the turn. Read more: 15 best chart patterns every trader should know In practice the two names are used interchangeably more often than not. What matters is the same in both cases: the level was run, and the move was rejected. The table below lines up the differences. One honest caveat on that volume row: spot forex has no centralised volume, so any volume you see is tick or broker volume. Treat it as indicative of activity, not as a precise exchange figure. Step through the mechanics and the move stops looking mysterious. First, price approaches an obvious level where stops and pending orders are clustered. Second, it pushes just beyond, triggering that wave of orders. Third, those triggered orders briefly add fuel in the breakout direction — which is exactly what traps the traders who bought or sold the break. And fourth, with the liquidity now taken, the move runs out of road: price stalls, gets rejected back through the level, and frequently reverses. Tie that back to bias and it is simple. When the orders below a low are swept and price snaps back up, it points bullish. When the orders above a high are swept and price drops back, it points bearish. Here's the part that keeps me out of trouble: not every push beyond a level is a sweep. If price keeps going and accepts the new level — closing and holding beyond it with follow-through — that's a genuine breakout, not a sweep, and trying to fade it is a mug's game. The moves that caught me out early on were almost always these: I'd read a real breakout as a trap, sell into strength, and watch it run off without me. If you trade breakouts as well, it's worth knowing how the real thing behaves. Read more: Breakout trading strategy in forex: how to trade successfully All sweeps share the same logic — run the clustered orders, then decide direction — but it helps to know where they usually form. Here are the common ones. This is the most common type, because that is where stops are placed most obviously. The clear swing points sitting above recent highs and below recent lows are the prime targets, and most retail stops cluster a few pips beyond them. The edges of a range hold a lot of clustered pending orders and stops — breakout traders waiting above and below, plus the stops of those fading the range. That makes range boundaries a frequent sweep target before price decides its next move. Round numbers and the obvious "clean" levels most traders watch — a round figure such as 1.1000, or a widely-quoted prior high — pull in orders simply because everyone and their dog can see them. That shared attention turns them into easy targets. A smart-money sub-classification: external range liquidity sits beyond the major swing high or low of a range. When price runs it, the move often precedes a larger reversal, because the obvious extreme of the range has just been cleared. The other side of the coin: internal range liquidity sits inside the range — for example at a fair value gap, a price gap left behind when the market moved so fast it skipped a stretch of levels. Price retraces to take that liquidity before continuing its main move. Note that ERL and IRL describe the location of the liquidity relative to the range, not a different kind of level. Spotting a sweep comes down to reading where liquidity sits and how price reacts when it gets there. The steps below are how I work through it; this section is about identification — acting on it comes next. Mark the obvious pools first: recent swing highs and lows, the prior day's high and low, range edges, and clean or round levels. These are where stops and pending orders sit. Keep to a handful of well-defined zones — marking every minor wiggle just clutters the chart and hides the levels that matter. Reading chart structure cleanly is a skill in itself. Read more: How to read forex charts for traders Watch how price behaves as it reaches a key level. Does it pierce the level, get rejected, and close back inside — a sweep? Or does it close and hold beyond with follow-through — a real breakout? Wait for the reaction candle to close before deciding; guessing mid-move is how you end up on the wrong side. Price action simply means reading the raw movement of price on the chart — the candles themselves — rather than leaning on indicators. A price-action trader makes the call from what price is actually doing at a key level, not from a signal on a separate tool. A sweep often shows up as a fast spike through an obvious level that trips the clustered stops, leaving a long wick behind. That sharp poke-and-snap-back — a quick excursion that fails to hold — is the classic footprint, and once you have seen a few they become hard to miss. A sweep absorbing liquidity is often accompanied by a jump in activity. Keep this honest, though: spot forex has no centralised volume, so what you are reading is tick or broker volume. Use it as a rough confirmation of effort behind the move, not as a precise number. Before trusting the sweep, look for confirmation: a shift in market structure (price breaking the most recent swing the other way), a clear rejection candle, or the trail the move leaves behind. That trail usually points to one of two things worth knowing by name. A fair value gap is an imbalance left when price moves so fast it skips a stretch of levels, leaving a visible gap on the chart. Price often drifts back later to "fill" it, which makes it a tidy spot to look for an entry. An order block is the last candle before a big, impulsive move — roughly where the heavy orders were placed. Price tends to react when it returns to that zone, so traders treat it as a high-probability area of interest. Higher timeframes give cleaner, less noisy signals. Many traders, myself included, use a higher timeframe to set the bias and a lower one to time the entry — multiple-timeframe analysis that keeps you trading sweeps that line up with the bigger picture rather than random pokes. Once a sweep is confirmed, trading it is a repeatable routine rather than a guess at the exact turn. The playbook below frames every entry the same way: opposite the sweep, and only after confirmation. Start from the higher-timeframe bias so the trade aligns with direction. Then enter opposite the sweep once it is confirmed — often on the close of the rejection candle, or on a retrace into the fair value gap or order block the move left behind. The retrace entry usually gives a tighter, better-priced stop; the close entry gets you in sooner. Pick one and apply it consistently. A liquidity sweep example: EUR/USD. EUR/USD has an obvious swing high — buy-side liquidity — at 1.1830. Price spikes to 1.1845, trips the stops, then prints a candle that closes back below 1.1830: a sweep with rejection. After a confirming shift lower, I go short on the close at 1.1826, place the stop just above the wick high at 1.1850 — a risk of about 24 pips — and target the sell-side liquidity at a prior low near 1.1780, roughly 2:1. Had price instead closed and held above 1.1830 with follow-through, that would have been a genuine breakout, not a sweep, and the idea would be off. The result is settled in your GBP (£) account at the live exchange rate. Numbers here are hypothetical and for illustration only. Place the stop beyond the sweep's extreme — past the wick — with a small buffer. That obvious level is exactly where the next sweep aims, so a stop sitting right on it tends to get taken out by ordinary noise. A clean break back through that extreme tells you the idea has failed, and that is your cue to be out, no negotiating. Read more: What is a stop-loss order and how to set it Aim at the opposing liquidity zone — a prior obvious high or low where orders are waiting on the other side — or work to a fixed risk-to-reward such as 2:1 or 3:1. You do not have to treat it as all-or-nothing: scaling out, trimming into the opposing liquidity and trailing the rest, is a sensible way to bank part of the move while leaving room for it to run. Risk-to-reward weighs what you stand to lose against what you stand to gain. A 2:1 trade aims to make twice what you risk — risk 20 pips to target 40 — which lets you stay profitable even when fewer than half your trades win. The Smart Money Concept (SMC) frames all of this around one assumption: large players must seek out pools of liquidity to fill size, and sweeps are one of the clearer footprints they leave. It is a useful lens — but it is an interpretive model, not a guaranteed map of what any institution is actually doing. Treat it as a way to organise what you see, not as certainty — and if the jargon starts to feel heavy, don't worry: the takeaway underneath it is simple. A simple way to place a sweep inside a trading session is the AMD model — Accumulation, Manipulation, Distribution. The table shows where the sweep fits. You don't need the jargon to use the idea. Strip it back and it's the same instruction as everything above: wait for an obvious level to get run and rejected, then trade the bounce-back. Market sentiment plays its part here too — it's the crowd all piling in on the same side that builds the liquidity in the first place, and keeping half an eye on the financial news helps you anticipate where they'll lean next. Read more: What is market sentiment? Definition, indicators and strategies Sweeps happen in fast, jumpy conditions where spreads widen and slippage creeps in, so treat each setup as one trade in a numbers game — never as a guaranteed reversal. After more than a decade at the screens, these are the rules I keep coming back to — and the ones I most regret the days I ignored them. Risk a small, fixed percentage of the account on each trade — many traders cap it at 1–2% — so that a run of failed sweeps does no real damage. Sizing every trade the same way keeps one bad sequence from undoing weeks of good work. Put the stop past the sweep's wick with a buffer, never on the obvious level itself. That level is precisely where the next sweep is headed, so a stop resting on it is an invitation to be stopped out just before the trade works. Decide a daily or per-session loss limit in advance and stop when you hit it. After a couple of sweeps go against you, the temptation to win it straight back is strong — a loss cap takes that decision out of your hands and protects you from revenge trading. Don't stack the same sweep idea across highly correlated pairs; one macro move can invalidate them all at once and quietly multiply your risk. And expect wider spreads and more slippage around major releases, when these moves are at their most violent. Read more: 10 forex risk management tips every trader should know A liquidity sweep is a trading concept used by price action traders (also known as SMC or ICT traders). A liquidity sweep occurs when large institutions or market participants execute large orders, triggering pending buy or sell orders at levels of liquidity. Liquidity grabs occur from one candlestick having a quick reaction at a key liquidity level. Liquidity sweeps occur when price falls below a liquidity level and comes back up. However, liquidity sweeps can occur over several candles instead of just one like a liquidity grab. A liquidity sweep is a sudden, false breakout or breakdown past a key price level (like a previous swing high or low) to trigger resting stop-loss orders. Immediately following a sweep, the market typically experiences a sharp price reversal in the opposite direction and a sudden shift in market structure. Avoid placing stop losses at obvious levels (for example, just below recent lows or above recent highs). Wait for confirmation of a sweep and a potential reversal before entering trades. Use multiple timeframes to gain a better perspective on price action. Liquidity sweeps appear on every timeframe, from the one-minute to the monthly. Higher timeframes tend to give more reliable, less noisy signals, which is why many traders combine a higher timeframe for bias with a lower one to time the entry. Read more: Best time to trade forex: When to enter the market during the day No. A sweep works best as confluence — combined with market structure, a fair value gap, or an order block, plus a confirmation signal — rather than as a standalone trigger. On its own, a level being run is not yet a reason to enter. A liquidity sweep is price running the obvious stops above a high or below a low and then reversing — a footprint of where the orders were, not a crystal ball. The practical takeaway is the same throughout: identify the zones, wait for the sweep and a confirmed rejection, then trade the reaction with disciplined risk. Used patiently, it can sharpen your entries; chased blindly, it is just another way to get trapped. If there is one edge in all of this, it is patience. Let price run an obvious level and reject it before you act — that single habit is most of what separates trading like a pro from becoming the liquidity everyone else is hunting.

A bull flag is a continuation chart pattern that signals a potential resumption of an existing uptrend after a brief pause. One of the biggest challenges forex traders face is telling a genuine continuation pattern apart from a false breakout that quickly reverses. Spotting the difference can be the difference between catching a strong trend and watching a promising trade turn into a frustrating loss. In this guide, I'll explain exactly what a bull flag is, how it forms, how to identify it on a forex chart, and how traders can use it to plan entries, stops, and profit targets. I'll also walk through a practical forex example, highlight common mistakes, and show how proper risk management can improve your trading results. A bull flag is a bullish continuation pattern that develops after a strong upward price movement. It consists of a sharp rally known as the flagpole, followed by a short period of consolidation that forms the flag. When price eventually breaks above the flag's upper boundary, traders often read it as a sign that buyers are regaining control and that the previous uptrend may continue. Ready to start putting these patterns to work? Open an account and trade them in live market conditions. A bull flag is a bullish continuation pattern that appears after a strong upward price movement and suggests that the existing uptrend may continue. In forex trading, a bull flag forms when a market pauses after a sharp rally rather than immediately reversing. The initial surge creates the flagpole, while the temporary consolidation forms the flag itself. If buyers return and push the price above the flag's resistance level, the pattern is considered complete. Read more: What is forex trading? How it works for beginners Think of a bull flag as the market catching its breath before potentially moving higher again. Because bull flags often appear within established trends, many traders use them to find potential continuation opportunities rather than trying to predict market reversals. If you are still building your chart-reading foundations, it helps to see where flags sit among the other major patterns. Read more: 15 best chart patterns every trader should know A bull flag develops when strong buying pressure pushes the market sharply higher, creating the flagpole. After this rapid advance, some traders take profits, causing price to consolidate rather than continue straight up. Importantly, this consolidation usually happens without significant selling pressure. Instead of reversing, the market simply pauses while buyers and sellers temporarily reach equilibrium. If buyers regain control, price breaks above the flag and the uptrend resumes. That sequence — strong demand, a temporary pause, then renewed buying interest — is exactly what makes the pattern reflect healthy trend behaviour. One thing I've noticed over the years is that beginner traders often focus entirely on the shape of the pattern while ignoring the story behind it. The real clue is not the flag itself; it's the fact that sellers cannot push the market significantly lower after a strong rally. When a market has every excuse to fall but only manages a shallow pullback, that's often telling you buyers are still lurking beneath the surface. A bull flag consists of two distinct parts: the flagpole and the flag. Understanding the difference between the two is essential because the quality of each component often determines how reliable the pattern is. The flagpole represents a strong, impulsive move higher. This is the part that attracts traders' attention because it shows clear buying pressure and momentum. Ideally, the move should be sharp and decisive rather than a slow grind higher. The flag is the consolidation phase that follows. During this period, price typically retraces between 10% and 25% of the flagpole's length and moves within two parallel trendlines. The pullback should be relatively orderly and shorter in duration than the flagpole itself. Traders watch this structure closely because a healthy flag tells you buyers are resting, not abandoning the trend. Bull flags, bear flags, and pennants are all continuation patterns, but they differ in structure and the direction of the trend they typically continue. A bull flag forms after an upward move and signals potential continuation higher. A bear flag appears after a sharp decline and suggests further downside. A pennant resembles a small symmetrical triangle rather than a parallel channel, and can occur in either bullish or bearish markets. Visually, a bull flag looks like a downward-sloping rectangle, while a bull pennant looks more like a small triangle that narrows over time. As your trading experience grows, you'll notice that all three patterns tell a similar story: a strong move, a pause, and then an attempt to continue in the original direction. The difference lies in how that pause develops. A close relative worth studying alongside flags is the head and shoulders, which marks the opposite — a potential trend reversal. Read more: Head and shoulders pattern trading strategy for beginners One mistake I see quite regularly is traders calling every small pullback a bull flag. In reality, quality bull flags are surprisingly neat. If the pullback becomes messy, volatile, or retraces most of the original move, the odds of a successful continuation tend to fall dramatically. A bull flag is easiest to identify when you approach it as a checklist rather than trying to spot shapes randomly on a chart. Many traders focus entirely on the flag itself, but the real clue lies in the sequence of events that unfolds before, during, and after the pattern develops. The strongest setups tell a clear story of buyers taking control, pausing briefly, and then returning to push prices higher. Before looking for a bull flag, confirm that the market is already moving higher. A continuation pattern needs a trend to continue. Look for: If there is no obvious uptrend, there is no bull flag. Reading these signals cleanly is a skill in itself, and a solid grounding in chart structure makes the whole process faster. Read more: How to read forex charts for traders The flagpole should stand out clearly on the chart. Characteristics include: The stronger the flagpole, the more attention traders tend to give the pattern. After the rally, price begins to consolidate. Draw two parallel trendlines around the consolidation area. The flag should: A deep or chaotic pullback may signal weakening momentum rather than healthy consolidation. This is where many traders gain an edge. The volume story often follows a three-act sequence. That sequence shows enthusiasm during the initial rally, reduced selling pressure during consolidation, and renewed buying interest on the breakout. One honest caveat: spot forex has no centralised volume, so any volume you see is tick or broker volume — useful as a guide to activity, not a precise figure. The pattern is not complete until price breaks above the upper boundary of the flag. Many traders wait for: Patience here often saves traders from entering false breakouts too early. Trading a bull flag ultimately comes down to two decisions: where to enter, and how to confirm that the breakout is genuine. Get these two right, and you'll often find yourself trading alongside the prevailing trend rather than fighting it. There are two common approaches used by forex traders: aggressive entries and conservative entries. An aggressive trader enters while the flag is still forming, typically near the lower trendline of the consolidation channel. Advantages: Disadvantages: This approach can work well for experienced traders who are comfortable reading price action and managing risk. A conservative trader waits for confirmation and enters after price breaks above the upper trendline of the flag. Advantages: Disadvantages: For newer traders, the conservative approach is often the safer option because it prioritises confirmation over anticipation. Not every breakout deserves to be traded. One of the most reliable signs of a genuine breakout is a noticeable increase in volume. Many traders look for volume that is at least 50% higher than the average seen during the flag consolidation phase. Additional confirmation tools include: The more confirmation factors that align, the greater the chance that the breakout reflects genuine buying interest rather than a short-lived spike. If you want to get comfortable with the momentum tools mentioned above, our indicator guide is a good next step. Read more: The best forex indicators every trader should use in 2025 Spotting bull flags on a historical chart is one thing. Learning to identify them in live market conditions is where real experience is built. Practising on a demo account helps you develop pattern-recognition skills without putting capital at unnecessary risk. Theory is useful, but seeing a bull flag play out in a practical forex scenario makes the concept much easier to grasp. The example below uses GBP/USD and shows how traders might identify the pattern, calculate a target, and manage risk. Important: this example is purely educational and should not be viewed as a trading signal. Past chart patterns do not guarantee future results. Suppose GBP/USD rallies from 1.2500 to 1.2700 following a stronger-than-expected UK economic data release. The sharp advance creates the flagpole and signals strong buying momentum. Flagpole calculation: 1.2700 − 1.2500 = +200 pips. Following the rally, buyers begin taking some profits while new participants hesitate to chase the market higher. Price consolidates between a high of 1.2680 and a low of 1.2640, with volume gradually declining as the consolidation develops. This creates a classic downward-sloping flag structure rather than an aggressive sell-off. After several sessions of consolidation, GBP/USD closes above the upper flag boundary at 1.2680. A conservative trader waits for this breakout confirmation before entering. The stop loss is placed below the flag low, allowing room for normal market fluctuations while protecting against a failed pattern. Example trade entry: Entry 1.2680 · Stop loss 1.2625 · Risk 55 pips. One of the most popular ways to project a bull flag target is the measured move technique. The principle is simple: the flagpole height is projected from the breakout point to estimate the potential future move. Measured move: 1.2680 + 200 pips = 1.2880 (breakout level + flagpole height = target). This gives traders a logical profit objective based on the structure of the pattern itself. Some traders prefer Fibonacci extensions to a traditional measured move. A commonly used level is the 161.8% Fibonacci extension. In strong trending conditions, GBP/USD may reach the measured move target and continue towards the 161.8% extension, offering additional profit-taking opportunities. For this reason, many traders scale out of positions: The bull flag works because it lets traders join an existing trend rather than trying to predict a reversal. Instead of buying after an already-extended rally, traders wait for a controlled consolidation and then look for evidence that buyers are returning. Of course, no chart pattern works 100% of the time. Even the cleanest bull flag can fail unexpectedly due to economic data, central bank announcements, geopolitical events, or a simple shift in market sentiment. That is why risk management remains every bit as important as pattern recognition. Read more: What is market sentiment? Definition, indicators and strategies After more than a decade of trading, I've found that the strongest bull flags often appear when a market has a genuine fundamental reason to move higher. A bullish interest-rate surprise, stronger-than-expected employment numbers, or a shift in central bank expectations can all provide the fuel that turns a simple chart pattern into a sustained trend. The chart pattern gets you interested. The underlying market story often decides how far the move ultimately travels. Even a textbook bull flag can fail. That's why successful trading isn't just about spotting patterns — it's about protecting your capital when the market doesn't cooperate. The mistakes below are some of the most common ways traders turn a good setup into a losing trade. A bull flag needs a strong preceding move. Without a clear flagpole, you're simply trading random consolidation. Solution: always verify there was a strong bullish impulse before looking for a flag. Many traders jump in while the flag is still forming, only to watch price keep drifting lower. Solution: wait for a confirmed break above resistance, or a strong bullish close. A proper bull flag tells a volume story: strong volume during the rally, reduced volume during consolidation, and increased volume on the breakout. Solution: look for that classic volume sequence before committing to a trade. Even the best setups lose sometimes. Trading too large can turn a normal losing trade into a serious account setback. Solution: risk a fixed percentage of your account on every trade. Market conditions play a major role in whether a bull flag succeeds or fails. A pattern that works beautifully in a strong uptrend may struggle in a choppy or range-bound market, which is why many experienced traders only take bull flags that align with the higher-timeframe trend. Major economic events can also disrupt even the cleanest technical setup. Examples include: I've seen perfectly formed patterns fail within seconds because of an unexpected news headline. For that reason, always check the economic calendar before entering a trade. The takeaway is that a bull flag should never be traded in isolation. Context matters. A broader risk-management routine keeps these setups from doing real damage when they fail. Read more: 10 forex risk management tips every trader should know Read more: What is a stop-loss order and how to set it The risk-reward ratio (R) compares your potential profit to your potential loss. Using our GBP/USD example, the entry sits at 1.2680 with a stop loss at 1.2625 (a risk of 55 pips) and a target at 1.2880 (a reward of 200 pips). Risk-reward: 200 pips reward ÷ 55 pips risk ≈ 3.6:1. A 3.6:1 risk-reward ratio means one winning trade can offset several losing ones. You don't need to be right all the time: even with a win rate below 50%, traders can stay profitable if they consistently target favourable risk-reward opportunities. This is why professional traders often focus on risk-reward first and trade entries second. Position sizing determines how much of your account is exposed on a single trade. One of the most widely used guidelines is the 2% rule: never risk more than 2% of your trading capital on a single position. Example: with an account balance of £50,000, the maximum risk per trade is £50,000 × 2% = £1,000. With a 55-pip stop loss, the position size is adjusted so that a 55-pip loss equals £1,000. Without position sizing, one bad trade can damage your account, emotional decision-making increases, and recovery becomes much harder. With proper position sizing, losses stay manageable, consistency improves, and long-term survival becomes far more likely. The goal isn't to win every trade — it's to stay in the game long enough for your edge to play out. The same discipline applies to choosing a direction, whether you are going long or short. Read more: Long vs short position compared: how to trade each like a pro Leverage lets traders control larger positions using a smaller amount of capital. While it can increase profits, it can also magnify losses at exactly the same rate. Many beginners focus on how much leverage is available rather than how much risk they are taking — often a costly mistake. Sensible leverage principles: The most successful traders I know don't think about leverage first; they think about risk first. Leverage is best viewed as a tool, not a shortcut to profits. Read more: What is leverage in forex and how much should you use? A bull flag is a technical analysis chart pattern that signals a potential continuation of an existing uptrend. It consists of a strong bullish move known as the flagpole, followed by a short period of consolidation called the flag, before price potentially continues higher. Higher highs and higher lows generally signal a bullish market because they indicate increasing buying pressure. Lower highs and lower lows typically suggest a bearish trend where sellers remain in control. Yes. A bull flag fails when price breaks below the lower boundary of the flag instead of breaking higher. This is why traders typically place stop losses beneath the flag structure to limit potential losses. A bullish market often provides buying opportunities because prices are trending higher. However, traders should still wait for confirmation signals and apply proper risk management rather than buying simply because the market appears bullish. Yes. Bull flags tend to perform best on highly liquid currency pairs such as GBP/USD, EUR/USD, and USD/JPY, where price action is often cleaner and trends are more established. Bull flags can be useful for beginners, but they should not be used as a standalone trading strategy. Combining the pattern with trend analysis, support and resistance, and risk management generally produces better results. Waiting for breakout confirmation is usually the safer approach because it reduces the risk of false signals. Early entries may offer better risk-reward ratios but carry a higher probability of failure. Yes. Despite the growth of algorithmic trading, bull flags continue to appear because they reflect market psychology and order flow. However, traders should always combine pattern analysis with broader market context and risk management. A bull flag is one of the most widely recognised continuation patterns in forex trading because it offers a structured way to join an existing trend. The pattern combines a strong flagpole, a controlled consolidation phase, and a breakout that can offer attractive trading opportunities. The most important clues are often the three-act volume story — surge, contraction, and expansion — and the measured move projection used to estimate potential targets. Even so, the strongest setup still requires confirmation, disciplined risk management, and sensible position sizing. No chart pattern guarantees future results, but traders who combine technical analysis with sound risk management put themselves in a much stronger position over the long term. Learning to identify bull flags on historical charts is a great starting point, but real improvement comes from spotting them in live market conditions and managing trades effectively.

Micron Technology (MU) massively exceeded expectations with its third quarter earnings report, published after market close on Wednesday, causing shares in the company to soar 16% during the following session. Record-breaking revenue figures suggest that customers are more than willing to pay increased prices for memory, a fact that manifested very differently for Apple (AAPL), whose shares sank 6% on Thursday after the computer giant announced price hikes to its Mac and iPad range of products. In a very blunt statement, Apple admitted that the rapid expansion of AI data centres has created a surge in demand for memory and storage and that the company has reached a point where it is unable to shield their customers from the resulting price increases. The relentless demand from AI endeavours has been known to cause shortages and higher prices in the consumer market for several years already – ask anyone trying to build their own PC – but the latest chapter now illustrates the direct competition between major tech firms. Apple was not the only giant to falter on Thursday, with the remainder of the magnificent seven also closing yesterday’s session in the red. Speaking of which, Micron’s recent ascent, coupled with the introduction of SpaceX (SPCX) to the Nasdaq, has somewhat reshuffled the pecking order in terms of America’s largest companies by market capitalisation. Micron briefly surpassed both Tesla and Meta on Thursday, while SpaceX and Broadcom currently occupy the 6th and 7th spot respectively. The AI boom has made heroes of companies that had been overlooked for many years and soon the magnificent seven may well swell to the magnificent ten. Yesterday’s PCE price index changed very little in terms of the overall inflation picture. Expectations were largely met and while the headline figure topped 4.1%, the core inflation rate only increased 0.3% in May; not enough to trigger any immediate shift in monetary policy. Expectations for a rate hike actually fell following the publication, with interest rate traders now looking at a 70% chance of a rate hold during the next Fed meeting on the 29th of July. With that said, markets are still coming to terms with a stronger dollar, a narrative that has punished non-yield-bearing assets harshly. Gold is in the process of losing $4,000 per ounce while silver is down to $56. The white metal has now more than halved in value since setting a record high of $120 per ounce earlier this year. Over in cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin lost $60,000 yesterday and is currently bogged down in the mid-$58,000 range. Needless to say, sentiment in the crypto sphere is truly in the gutter. #MU #AAPL #BTC About the Author Lawrence J. came from a strong technical and engineering background before pivoting into a more financial role later on in his career. Always interested in international finance, Lawrence is experienced in both traditional markets as well as the emerging crypto markets. He now serves as the financial writer for RADEX MARKETS. Reviewed by RADEX MARKETS Risk Warning: Trading derivatives and leveraged products carries a high level of risk, including the risk of losing substantially more than your initial investment.

The recent conflict in Iran severely tightened global oil supplies, starving the world of millions of barrels that would normally flow out of the Strait of Hormuz, leading to an acute spike in crude oil prices. In response, many countries around the world were forced to tap into their own domestic petroleum reserves in order to make up for the shortfall. This in no small part explains why oil prices only rose to the extent that they did. Instead of entering a bidding war for every last barrel of oil on Earth, governments around the world instead adopted a policy of using what resources were already available to them, while being more frugal with such. China in particular was able to dramatically reduce crude imports by making use of its vast inventories, while also throttling refinery output and limiting consumption within its borders. Similar approaches were adopted throughout the world; a collective strategy that did much to cushion the supply shock. An interesting but overlooked point about all of this is that a number of countries were well prepared for such an outcome. Why so? Why do nations around the world maintain strategic oil reserves? As with many other facets of the global oil industry, the reasoning stems from the 1973 oil crisis. Towards the tail end of that year, Egypt, Syria and a number of Arabic nations launched a joint offensive against Israel. While the conflict itself would wind down relatively quickly, ending with a ceasefire less than three weeks into hostilities, the Arabic world, via OPEC, elected to punish all Western powers deemed to have been supportive of Israel by means of a wide-ranging oil embargo. The embargo would last a mere six months, but this would be enough to prompt fuel shortages in many countries, causing oil prices to quadruple in some cases. The United States were not prepared for the ensuing supply shock, suffering significant inflationary pressures and poor economic growth as a result of the lack of petroleum. The US government was forced to implement a number of emergency measures, including a national 55 mph speed limit, year-round daylight-saving time and public campaigns to encourage energy conservation. Such measures were mostly temporary, but the crisis would provide the political momentum for the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, signed by President Ford in late 1975. The act included the creation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, designed to ensure the US would never again be caught with its pants down. And so, over the following decades, the United States, and later other nations, would embark on vast oil storage infrastructure projects. The first image that comes to mind when hearing about petroleum storage is perhaps that of a large standing oil tank or silo, but this is generally not the case. Rather than build expensive above-ground facilities, the US elected to store the precious resource exactly where it came from: underground. Huge caverns were carved out by injecting water into underground salt deposits and removing the resulting brine, creating extremely large cavities that were relatively inexpensive to maintain. Salt caverns have a number of beneficial properties when it comes to storing crude oil. The first is that salt is self-sealing; small cracks that would otherwise become leak paths in other rock formations will naturally close under pressure, making salt a self-sustaining containment vessel. The second advantage is that because the oil is stored underground, it is protected from the surrounding environment. Temperatures are much more stable, evaporation is minimal, extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes or tornados are a non-issue, as are any potential military threats. The third point is that salt cavern storage makes withdrawing the oil very easy: simply pump the cavern with water and the lighter crude oil will rise to the top, ready to be pumped out. The United States had a head start in such endeavours, reaching a peak storage capacity of 727 million barrels by the mid-2000s, which it would fill to the brim by the year 2009. As of the time of writing, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is roughly half full, but the amount of crude oil held in commercial reserves bumps the total figure up significantly. As mentioned in the opening paragraph, China also has huge crude oil storage facilities, but unfortunately getting an accurate figure is somewhat complicated by the fact that the Chinese state does not officially report on the volume of its reserves. Moreover, statistics often conflate government reserves and commercial inventories into the same figure, which amount to around 1.3 billion barrels in total. Somewhat surprisingly, the country with the third largest reserves is Japan, at around 300 million barrels in government capacity, plus another 180 million barrels in mandatory private sector reserves. Taking population sizes and domestic consumption into account, Japan is very well insulated against supply shocks, maintaining inventories equivalent to 5 or 6 months of consumption, not only as crude oil, but as refined petroleum products as well, including petrol, diesel, kerosene and jet fuel. The safeguarding reflects the island nation’s reliance on foreign energy imports, as well as its vulnerability to natural disasters, which require usable fuel to be readily available. Firing up a refinery in the aftermath of a tsunami or earthquake is obviously not ideal when emergency vehicles need to be deployed to save lives. When the US boasted full storage reserves back in 2009, it was still a net importer of petroleum products. As of today, the United States exports more total petroleum products than it imports, granting it an extra buffer against supply disruptions, somewhat justifying an only half-full SPR. China, due to its huge population size, is still a massive importer of crude oil because it produces only 30% of the amount needed to satisfy domestic demand, which explains the gigantic reserves accumulated in recent years. While the US, Japan and China were able to withstand the recent supply disruptions with demonstrable preparedness, many countries around the world did not weather the storm so elegantly. South and South-East Asia were hit disproportionately hard, suffering economic consequences from the lack of oil and natural gas almost immediately. Pakistan and Bangladesh faced instant shortages, causing significant drops in industrial production and forcing both countries to introduce energy austerity measures. Given its huge population and comparatively small reserves, India was also unprepared for the supply shock, but managed to get away with it by aggressively buying from Russia; the event nevertheless served as a loud warning shot to build more storage facilities. Further east, it came to light that the Philippines imports up to 98% of its crude oil from the Gulf, while having absolutely no state-owned strategic reserves to speak of. The archipelago declared a state of emergency as early as March as the impact of fuel shortages ravaged its battered economy. Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia all implemented shorter work weeks or work-from-home initiatives to save power, while rearranging commercial supplies and using emergency measures to make up for the shortfall. The lack of natural gas forced a number of countries in the region to lean more heavily on coal-fired generation to plug the gap. Needless to say, environmental concerns flew out the window over the course of the past few months. Further north, the lack of oil and natural gas resulted in a very different problem. South Korea and Taiwan are renowned for their role in semiconductor manufacturing, an extremely energy-intensive industry that requires constant uptime. Disruptions to energy supplies, fluctuating freight and insurance rates, higher logistics expenses, unreliable deliveries of crucial chemicals and gases, all have immediate and profound impacts on the technology sectors of such advanced economies. The semiconductor industry can absorb very high energy costs before production becomes uneconomical – a computer chip is infinitely more valuable than a barrel of oil; the bigger problem is that so many vital pieces of the puzzle are dependent on a single shipping lane in the Middle East. The 20% drawdown in the Korean Kospi index between February and March illustrates the danger well enough. Global energy architecture is incredibly fragile. The recent conflict in Iran was a wake-up call for many. The main take away is that being totally reliant on foreign nations for something as fundamental as power generation is strategically unacceptable. The lesson could have been much harsher. About the Author Lawrence J. came from a strong technical and engineering background before pivoting into a more financial role later on in his career. Always interested in international finance, Lawrence is experienced in both traditional markets as well as the emerging crypto markets. He now serves as the financial writer for RADEX MARKETS. Reviewed by RADEX MARKETS Risk Warning: Trading derivatives and leveraged products carries a high level of risk, including the risk of losing substantially more than your initial investment.